Danny Ings Is ‘Pursued’ By Leicester Fans Views

Posted by  phil@hollogram.com   in       5 years ago     1335 Views     Leave your thoughts  

Danny Ings is on Leicesters radar…
Is he good enough for us?!

We asked the fans for their views…

Darryl Elliott
Stay away we are supposed to be pushing for Europe we need to be picking off the best of what’s at the bottom like Aaron mooy jonjo shelvey or try getting that Tammy Abraham from Chelsea need players who have played or are playing.

Leighton Morrell
He would be a good signing. Remember Albrighton and Huth were both considered injury prone when Leicester signed them and look how well they both did

John Pate
He’s awesome as long as he’s playing with Kieran Trippier. He needs the ball crossing to his feet, no more than six yards from goal.

Natalie Ward
Why are we looking at someone who is always injured and hasn’t really played for 2 years.

Philip Trigg
I said “we need 2 signings” not “we need to sign Ings.

Anthony Lowe
Feels like 1995 atm! big no ,always injured and not good enough to lace Vardys boots.

Michael Tanner
Yes yes yes….been saying this all last season.

Ben Kane
I like him he’s had one bad injury and if we can keep him injury free he’d make a great impact player.

Chris Loomes
No thanks. When are we going to sign some wingers?

Stephen Payne
Most def sign him now b4 Southampton get him

Notrub MJ
Would be a massive step backwards.

Nick Kirk
For god sake, proves a lack of ambition again.

Mark Curtis
he didn’t want to come to us 2 1/2 years ago why have him now injury prone.

Ivor James
Can’t see him doing any good for lcfc we need to buy quality.

Nathan Burton
At the right price he would be a good option.

Wayne Henton
Championship player.

Kierran Mcmullan
Rather take Sturridge and origi.

No Comments

No comments yet. You should be kind and add one!

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags:   <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>